Every couple who opens their relationship establishes rules. What's allowed, what isn't, how things are communicated, what happens if someone develops feelings. The rules feel important in the planning stage. They provide a framework. They reduce anxiety about the unknown.
What years of collective lifestyle experience have shown is that some rules hold up and some don't. Here's the difference.
Rules that work
The rules that hold up over time are almost all communication-based rather than activity-based. Rules like: we always debrief after any lifestyle experience. We check in with each other during any evening. We can call a stop to anything at any point for any reason. We don't make decisions about what's acceptable in the moment under social pressure.
These rules work because they create process rather than trying to predict every specific situation that might arise. The lifestyle produces novel situations that no set of pre-established rules can fully anticipate. Process rules give you tools for handling whatever happens rather than trying to legislate against every possible eventuality.
Rules that tend to fall apart
Activity-based rules, specifically around which sexual acts are allowed or not allowed with others, often create more problems than they solve. The rule that sounds clear in advance becomes ambiguous in practice. What counts as oral sex in this specific context? Does the rule apply if we're all in the same room? What if it happened before we could discuss it?
The problem isn't usually the rule itself but the false security it creates. A couple with a detailed list of allowed and forbidden activities sometimes puts less work into communication because they feel the rules cover it. When a situation arises that the rules didn't anticipate, they're less prepared to handle it than a couple who didn't rely on the rules in the same way.
The "we don't develop feelings" rule
This is the most common rule in open relationships and the most commonly broken. Feelings develop. The rule doesn't prevent them. At best it creates a context where people feel unable to acknowledge feelings honestly because they're technically breaking the agreement.
A more useful approach is: if feelings develop, we talk about them. The rule addresses what you do with feelings rather than trying to prevent them arising, which is not something rules can actually achieve.
Matching rules to your actual relationship
The rules that work for one couple may not work for another. A rule that gives couple A genuine security might be unnecessary for couple B or counterproductive for couple C. Rules need to fit how you actually function rather than how you think you should function.
The way to find out what rules you actually need is to start with minimal rules, have experiences, see what comes up, and build rules in response to actual situations rather than trying to anticipate every possible scenario from behind a desk before anything has happened. Most experienced lifestyle couples have very few formal rules after a few years because they've developed communication habits that make most rules redundant.
The rule that matters most
If you could only have one rule it would be this: if something feels wrong, say so. Not eventually, not after you've processed it alone for three days. At the time, or as close to the time as possible.
Everything else follows from that. The debrief, the check-ins, the ability to stop something, the ability to exit a situation, all of these depend on both people being willing to say when something isn't right. A relationship where that's genuinely safe can sustain itself through almost any situation the lifestyle produces. A relationship where it isn't safe will struggle regardless of how detailed the rulebook is.
SpicySwingers is the UK's free lifestyle community. Connect with couples who've figured out what actually works. Create your free profile.